Efekti programa medicinskog obrazovanja koristeći virtuelnu stvarnost: sistematski pregled i meta-analiza.
International journal of environmental research and public health
Sažetak istraživanja
Nekoliko studija je ispitivalo efekte obrazovanja virtuelne stvarnosti (VR). Međutim, to su uglavnom sistematski pregledi ili meta-analize koje se fokusiraju na doktore i štićenike; ne uzimaju u obzir VR medicinsko obrazovanje za širi krug učenika. Procijenili smo djelotvornost VR edukacije za zdravstvene radnike i identificirali bitne karakteristike edukacije. Randomizirana kontrolirana ispitivanja objavljena od januara 2000. do aprila 2020. identificirana su od PubMed-a, Embasea, CINAHL-a i Cochrane biblioteke (n = 299). Rizik od pristranosti randomiziranih studija procijenjen je korištenjem Cochraneovog alata Risk of Bias. Meta- i podgrupne analize su sprovedene korišćenjem Review Manager-a 5.4.1. Ukupni efekat je mjeren korištenjem Hedgesovog g i određen korištenjem Z-statistike ( p 2 i I 2 statistike. Među identifikovanim zapisima, 25 studija je odabrano kroz sistematski pregled, a 18 studija je uključeno u metaanalizu. Identificirali smo značajno poboljšanje nivoa vještina i zadovoljstva VR grupe, a da je manje imerzivno imerzivno i potpuni VR bilo manje znanje imerzivno i potpuni VR. Maksimiziranje prednosti VR će povećati mogućnosti učenja i dopuniti ograničeno kliničko iskustvo, čime će se poboljšati medicinske usluge.
Prikaži originalni naslov i sažetak na engleskom
Effects of Medical Education Program Using Virtual Reality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Several studies have examined the effect of virtual reality (VR) education. However, they are mostly systematic reviews or meta-analyses focusing on doctors and residents; they fail to consider VR medical education for a broader range of learners. We evaluated the effectiveness of VR education for health professionals and identified the essential features of education. Randomized controlled trials published from January 2000 to April 2020 were identified from PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library (n = 299). The randomized studies' bias risk was evaluated using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool. Meta- and subgroup-analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4.1. The overall effect was measured using Hedges' g and determined using Z-statistics ( p 2 and I 2 statistics. Among the identified records, 25 studies were selected through systematic review, and 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. We identified a significant improvement in the VR group's skill and satisfaction levels, and that less immersive VR was more efficacious for knowledge outcomes than fully immersive VR. Maximizing the advantages of VR will increase learning opportunities and complement the limited clinical experience, thus improving medical services. A systematic and efficient VR medical education program will greatly enhance learners' core competencies.
Izvorni podaci
- DOI
- 10.3390/ijerph20053895
- PMID
- 36900904
- PMCID
- PMC10001289
- Provjereno
- 2026-07-26
Naslov i sažetak prevedeni su automatski i prijevod može sadržavati netačnosti ili neprecizne stručne izraze. Za sve detalje, citiranje i medicinsko tumačenje pregledajte originalnu englesku verziju članka. Ne donosite zdravstvene odluke samo na osnovu ovog prijevoda.
Pregledaj originalni članak na engleskom